Theorem Reuse by Proof Term Transformation
نویسندگان
چکیده
Proof reuse addresses the issue of how proofs of theorems in a specific setting can be used to prove other theorems in different settings. This paper proposes an approach where theorems are generalised by abstracting their proofs from the original setting. The approach is based on a representation of proofs as logical framework proof terms, using the theorem prover Isabelle. The logical framework allows type-specific inference rules to be handled uniformly in the abstraction process and the prover’s automated proof tactics may be used freely. This way, established results become more generally applicable; for example, theorems about a data type can be reapplied to other types. The paper also considers how to reapply such abstracted theorems, and suggests an approach based on mappings between operations and types, and on systematically exploiting the dependencies between theorems.
منابع مشابه
Generalization and Reuse of Tactic
A tactic proof is a tree-structured sequent proof where steps may be justiied by tactic programs. We describe a prototype of a generic interactive theorem-proving system that supports the construction and manipulation of tactic proofs containing metavariables. The emphasis is on proof reuse. Examples of proof reuse are proof by analogy and reconstruction of partial proofs as part of recovering ...
متن کاملProving termination of CHR in Prolog: A transformational approach
In this paper we present a termination preserving transformation from Constraint Handling Rules to Prolog. The transformation is sound w.r.t. termination under the theoretical semantics of Constraint Handling Rules. It does not consider the presence of a propagation history. The transformation allows for the direct reuse of termination proof methods from Logic Programs and Term-Rewrite Systems,...
متن کاملGeneralization and Reuse of Tactic Proofs
A tactic proof is a tree-structured sequent proof where steps may be justiied by tactic programs. We describe a prototype of a generic interactive theorem-proving system that supports the construction and manipulation of tactic proofs containing metavariables. The emphasis is on proof reuse. Examples of proof reuse are proof by analogy and reconstruction of partial proofs as part of recovering ...
متن کاملA new proof for the Banach-Zarecki theorem: A light on integrability and continuity
To demonstrate more visibly the close relation between thecontinuity and integrability, a new proof for the Banach-Zareckitheorem is presented on the basis of the Radon-Nikodym theoremwhich emphasizes on measure-type properties of the Lebesgueintegral. The Banach-Zarecki theorem says that a real-valuedfunction $F$ is absolutely continuous on a finite closed intervalif and only if it is continuo...
متن کاملInternal Strategies in a Reeective Logic Strategies and Rewriting in Elan Tacticals in Ilf -and Why They Are Superruous Bernd Ingo Dahn 1.40pm -2.10pm Break Session 2: Strategy Analysis 2.10pm -2.40pm Strategies for Logic Programming Languages
i Preface The concept of strategy allows describing and guiding computations and deductions in automated theorem provers, proof checkers, logical frameworks. Strategies are used for various purposes, e.g. for-proof search in theorem proving,-combining diierent proof techniques and computation paradigms,-program transformation,-developing heuristics for playing games and nding proofs. Rules are ...
متن کامل